You wrote that "Michael Jackson's body is the greatest piece of postmodern American sculpture." What did you mean by that?
In a way I meant it literally. Actually that's the only way I meant it. If sculpture is visual
expression in three dimensions, that's what Michael's body became, and it's hard to
imagine a piece of art that more thoroughly transmitted the anxieties and contradictions
of his time.
http://blogs.sfweekly.com/exhibitionist/2011/11/great_writing_is_never_passive.php
In a way I meant it literally. Actually that's the only way I meant it. If sculpture is visual
expression in three dimensions, that's what Michael's body became, and it's hard to
imagine a piece of art that more thoroughly transmitted the anxieties and contradictions
of his time.
http://blogs.sfweekly.com/exhibitionist/2011/11/great_writing_is_never_passive.php
| He adores Michael Jackson, but Sullivan’s highest praise is reserved not for the man’s songs but for his physical body, which he calls “the greatest piece of postmodern American sculpture.” http://blogs.sfweekly.com/exhibitionist/2011/11/great_writing_is_never_passive.php hmmm..opera de arta...exact..numai haterii nu stiu sa aprecieze:) |
cum as putea sa nu fiu de acord? la discutia anterioara am si zis ca parca e sculptat, cel mai mult imi place ca e inalt si subtire, corpul lui ofera, vizual, echilibru, eu asa am impresia
ReplyDelete